“I track the problem and not the symptoms,” he adds, “In order to determine what and where the cause of the diseases is, I always do a blood smear and then a DNA testing,” Dr. Wickman said. The DNA will show everything that needs to be known about these diseases. “I analyze the Electromagnetic frequency from the blood smear to heal my patients, he said. Dr. Wickman has been practicing holistic healing and medicine for 40 years, twenty years in the United States, and twenty years in Quito, Ecuador. He said, “I wouldn’t have been able to do it with the support and medical guidance from my mentor Dr. Robert Ripley.” For the past 50 or so years, orthodox treatment has more or less stayed the same with a very poor cure rate. Why? They only have Chemotherapy, Radiation, or Surgery and maybe a combination of the three to work with. By now you would think that cutting out a cancer tumor for a cure would be known as impossible since the tumor is just the symptom and not the cause.
It is very important to get at the cause and most institutions are happy with removing the symptom and somehow weave into the mix the chemo or radiation to round out the treatment plan. With this routine there is less than a 2% "cure" rate. If they can slow the progress down for 5 years, it is considered a cure. Really, how could it be a cure if only the symptom is removed and the body is poisoned or radiated after the surgery? Sure, there are different techniques in the surgical suits being tried each day. After a work-up before surgery, it is determined how much of one's body should be removed never or almost never taking into consideration how he will live with what remains behind. To this, another attack will take place with a poison (chemotherapy) being infused which is another obstacle for the patient to overcome or maybe a series of powerful radiation treatments will be considered. A relatively strong patient is soon turned into a weak wimp too sick to get out of his own way. Is this the way a person should go on living? Is this progress?
Let me digress a bit. We now have the technology to make automobiles that don't use gasoline. Either they are electric or they burn an alternate type fuel or even water. Why is the gasoline engine still around? Could it be for the commercial benefit to the oil companies? What would this world be with no more gasoline produced? Have you seen a Polio, Small pox, or Tuberculosis patient lately? Why not? Maybe it is because those particular diseases have been cured or drastically controlled to not appear in society or on the horizon as they once did. TB Sanatoriums, foundations, or any other medical connections to these diseases have been eliminated due to lack of use. This is the good news! Today more and more cancer centers are built and being built to take care of the patients who have cancer. We have the technology related to the elimination of this disease so why is cancer still with us? Is it too difficult to put the patient's health first instead of cashing in on his disease? What is more important, the recovery of the patient or the wealth made by the "health" institutions including the pharmaceutical companies? What type of barbaric people are we that money comes before health? I know the technology exists to cure cancer because I use it everyday and see the results of patients returning to health. Families are kept together, the work place prospers as no losses occur from a death or disability of the worker with cancer, and friends continue seeing each other instead or remembering each other. Due to our soil depletions of vital minerals, our immune systems are compromised and do not function as they once did to protect us. Our defenses are down. Cancer is on the increase world wide. Why? A few minerals are put back into the land occasionally. Isn't that enough?
How can we, as intelligent, thinking, and a producing population put up with this picture? Something is very wrong! America is the number one country in the world for everything except health care where we rank number 56. How can 55 other countries be ahead of us offering better care for their people? Do they care about their people more than we do our own and do they provide better standards of living for their people? It is preposterous that we actually have a cure and it works, but is hidden from the public for financial reasons in many aspects. Why do we put up with this? We are all entitled to the good life as long as the Good Lord gives us life to live including the air to breathe. No one can be immortal in this world, but we sure could enjoy a better quality of life that is not provided for us. All tumors are not malignant. Some are benign but still ooze the life out of us through pain, quality of life, and inconvenience. Dr. Simoncini in Rome, Italy has found a fungus association with cancer. In fact, he calls fungi and cancer one in the same. Here in America we treat them separately and end up losing the battle for life. His treatment using Bicarbonate of Soda is probably too inexpensive for us. We go for the expensive treatments and the insurance companies pick up the tab except for those without insurance and they go without the possibility of having a quality life to look forward to.
Go to Dr. Simoncini's Treatment with Sodium Bicarbonate and read for yourself. See the before and after slide show presented there. This is exciting! An oncologist has broken the cancer sound barrier. He has put the "cure" into treating cancer. I have followed his findings and believe me, they work and patients get well. If a physician looks at an x-ray film containing cancer cells and fungi cells, he can't tell the difference and more than likely calls them both cancers. He tells the patient, "Your tumors are growing." He does not take the time to differentiate or even consider there might be a difference between cancer and fungi. What if they were the same thing? Let's face it; a massive FDA cover-up is in progress. Specimens from cancer patients in a hospital treating traditionally were confiscated and destroyed if the patient did not recover. They were called hazardous waste! These specimens were quarantined until destroyed. As a result this organic material could not be examined to determine what effect the chemo or radiation had nor could it be subjected to further testing using alternative treatments to find out if other methods were more effective. Bicarbonate of soda helps to cure cancer cells by destroying them in a very short time. The tumors decrease in size and a better quality of life is put back into the patient. Putting bicarbonate of soda into an injection form all of a sudden makes it a drug by FDA definition. Still, it would be far cheaper than any chemo drugs on the market today. Besides, it would be a cure rather than a palliative treatment because the cancer cells are dead.
Tumors in areas with less circulation can be attacked with frequencies as each type of tumor has its own frequency. Through a combination of sodium bicarbonate and electromagnetic waves the tumors can be dealt with and eliminated. Low level laser with specific frequencies helps eliminate the pain and inflammation caused by the growing tumor. Actually, traditional therapy should be called alternative therapy as it came along after the original "alternative therapy" was the standard of the day. Medicine or procedures that can't be guarded by a patent are not profitable. These non-invasive therapies are available if you know where to look for them. The important thing to remember is that all living cells have their own frequency and when a positive challenge is encountered it should be taken care of before more serious problems develop. Invest your money into alternative therapies instead of giving to large institutions or drug companies if you desire good health in the future. All drug companies have stock holders and these people want to make a profit on their investments, naturally. But it will come at the expense of health because no giant companies are out there producing alternative, natural procedures using supplements because a patent cannot be obtained. All their research would be available for everyone to use. We could have a very healthy America if we were willing to stand for our rites. This would move us toward number one in the world instead of where we are now. The bottom line is that cancer is a financially lucrative disease. It benefits stockholders, pharmaceutical companies, drug stores, hospitals and other treatment centers, and workers who depend on a livelihood in these areas. The losers are the people that can't take advantage of the alternative cures and go on believing the lies told them. We must get out of our boxes and look around.
www.doctor-cancer.org
We recommend:
Doing Well by Doing Good. In 1987, when the drug AZT was first approved for HIV treatment, the medic
Providing orthotics, wheelchairs, vehicle lifts and home health equipment so that patients can get m
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|










